Measuring influence

At The Splintered Mind, Eric Schwitzgebel gives what he describes as “a rough measure of current influence in … ‘mainstream Anglophone philosophy’.” His method starts with citations in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Considering only authors born after 1900, he tallies up the number of distinct articles in which they are cited.

The highly-influential Hilary Putnam is cited in 168 articles. Using that to ostensively define a unit, identify that as 1 Putnam of influence.

Putnam is in third place on the list, behind WVO Quine (1.14 Putnams of influence) and David Lewis (1.59 Putnams).

The inevitable vanity search and a little math reveals that I have 77.4 milliPutnams of influence.1 Should I be chuffed about that? Can I put it on my CV?

  1. An earlier version of this post contained the erroneous figure of 47.6.

One thought on “Measuring influence”

  1. PD,
    I notice your great-great-grandfather, Albertus Magnus, has a higher Putnam of influence than you. But he has had many more years to create a buzz than you have.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.