{"id":824,"date":"2019-07-23T17:37:08","date_gmt":"2019-07-23T17:37:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/?p=824"},"modified":"2019-07-23T17:37:28","modified_gmt":"2019-07-23T17:37:28","slug":"outlook-the-new-office","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/2019\/07\/23\/outlook-the-new-office\/","title":{"rendered":"Outlook, the new office"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In the course of moving down the hall to my new office, I emptied some file cabinets today and found some undated outlines for things I never wrote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>One of these is an outline for a book about the underdetermination of theory by data. It&#8217;s almost certainly from 2010 or earlier, because I wrote a great many outlines like it while still working through issues I had broached in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/job\/paper.php?item=thesis\">my dissertation<\/a>. After that, I shifted my attention to natural kinds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another of these is titled <em>Outlook\u2014 modest naturalism<\/em> and sketches a paper in two parts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The negative bit would argue for a kind of limited scepticism. There are no unrestricted quantifiers, so you can&#8217;t possibly give an account of all modalities and utterly everything. My notes end with the words, &#8220;no shortcuts&#8221;, which is a reference to a motto that I got from Matt Brown at a conference in 2009. The idea is that philosophers should not pretend to be able to settle any questions which scientists could eventually answer without actually doing the science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The positive bit would argue for the claim that science matters. It&#8217;s generally pretty good. Philosophers need to consider it where it&#8217;s relevant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Then, and I&#8217;m not sure where I thought this fit in: &#8220;No decisive answer to the sceptic or the staunch dogmatist&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Outline: into the rubbish bin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Some of it is contentious metaphysics which is best left undone (e.g., the stuff about quantifiers). Some of it is the banal standpoint of any sensible philosopher. It&#8217;s all still stuff I believe, but I don&#8217;t see myself ever writing that paper.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"840\" height=\"630\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/2019-07-23-13.12.12-1.jpg?resize=840%2C630&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"the new office, picture taken from the door\" class=\"wp-image-826\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/2019-07-23-13.12.12-1.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/2019-07-23-13.12.12-1.jpg?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/2019-07-23-13.12.12-1.jpg?resize=768%2C576&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/2019-07-23-13.12.12-1.jpg?resize=1200%2C900&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/2019-07-23-13.12.12-1.jpg?w=1680&amp;ssl=1 1680w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/2019-07-23-13.12.12-1.jpg?w=2520&amp;ssl=1 2520w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 1362px) 62vw, 840px\" \/><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the course of moving down the hall to my new office, I emptied some file cabinets today and found some undated outlines for things I never wrote.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9],"tags":[54,7],"class_list":["post-824","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-philosophy","tag-epistemology","tag-zettel"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7PjAo-di","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/824","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=824"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/824\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":828,"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/824\/revisions\/828"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}