{"id":2098,"date":"2024-12-20T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-12-20T13:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/?p=2098"},"modified":"2024-12-19T17:05:08","modified_gmt":"2024-12-19T22:05:08","slug":"doctor-gpt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/2024\/12\/20\/doctor-gpt\/","title":{"rendered":"Doctor gpt"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At <a href=\"https:\/\/dailynous.com\/2024\/12\/18\/gpt-could-easily-get-a-phd-on-any-philosophical-topic\/\">Daily Nous<\/a>, there&#8217;s discussion of <a href=\"https:\/\/theendsdontjustifythemeans.substack.com\/p\/why-you-should-be-talking-with-gpt\">Rebecca Lowe&#8217;s post<\/a> about how great it is to talk philosophy with the latest version of Chat GPT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There&#8217;s pushback in the comments. Others reply that the critics haven&#8217;t used the latest version (which is only available behind a paywall). Discussion of LLMs will always allow this: Complaints about their shortcomings are answered by pointing to the next version that&#8217;s supposed to resolve all the issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lowe and other commenters reveal that lots of philosophers are using LLMs in the regular day-to-day of their research. I&#8217;m still trying to figure out what I think about that. For now, let&#8217;s deflect Lowe&#8217;s ridiculous offhand claim that &#8220;Gpt could easily get a PhD on any philosophical topic.&#8221; I say ridiculous for a few reasons\u2014<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">First, LLM-based chatbots are best in the short run, where their outputs can be nudged along by helpful prompts. Writing a PhD thesis is long form writing.<span id='easy-footnote-1-2098' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/2024\/12\/20\/doctor-gpt\/#easy-footnote-bottom-1-2098' title=' This holds even for a three-papers thesis.'><sup>1<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Second, Lowe encourages us to &#8220;treat [the chatbot] as an equal, get it to role-play.&#8221; This approach naturally lulls the user into a pretense that the chatbot is a competent interlocutor. Recall the old-school program Eliza, which users could get quite intimate with when they treated it as an equal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Third, let&#8217;s suppose the LLM did write a qualifying PhD thesis.<span id='easy-footnote-2-2098' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'><\/span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/2024\/12\/20\/doctor-gpt\/#easy-footnote-bottom-2-2098' title=' This would probably be in fits and starts, with sections that a human editor would have to concatenate\u2014 but that was worries first and second.'><sup>2<\/sup><\/a><\/span> Why should that be a surprise? The model is trained on a great many things, among them PhD theses. Without guardrails to stop it from echoing training data verbatim, it could probably output <em>my<\/em> PhD thesis.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At Daily Nous, there&#8217;s discussion of Rebecca Lowe&#8217;s post about how great it is to talk philosophy with the latest version of Chat GPT. There&#8217;s pushback in the comments. Others reply that the critics haven&#8217;t used the latest version (which is only available behind a paywall). Discussion of LLMs will always allow this: Complaints about &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/2024\/12\/20\/doctor-gpt\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Doctor gpt&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[33,9],"tags":[73,31],"class_list":["post-2098","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-link-dump","category-philosophy","tag-ai","tag-technology"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7PjAo-xQ","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2098","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2098"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2098\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2099,"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2098\/revisions\/2099"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2098"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2098"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fecundity.com\/nfw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2098"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}